That's a good question, of which I don't know the answer. That could be
it, maybe we just don't do enough traffic to warrant a peering agreement
over the IX. It would be nice if I got a response one way or another
though, rather than just silence.
On 8/22/2024 6:17 PM, Tim Burke wrote:
Dumb question, but what is the traffic volume you are receiving from them?
I am probably beating a dead horse, but it seems like the larger content
networks will ignore unless a significant amount of traffic to/from the ASN in
question is riding over transit. Something like a few hundred megs or even a
gigabit may be a lot to you, but to others, it may be too small, and not worth
the administrative overhead or usage on their IX port(s). Conversely, anything
over a couple gigs may be too large for their IX ports and a PNI may be
advantageous instead.
On Aug 22, 2024, at 6:56 PM, Elijah Zeida <eli...@airbridgebroadband.com> wrote:
I've sent messages to GitHub three times for a peering agreement and haven't gotten any
response. They don't peer with the route servers at the IX we're at, and PeeringDB shows
they have an "Open" peering policy. Anyone have any advice?
--
Elijah Zeida | AirBridge Broadband - Network Engineer
Office: 208-494-4343 | Direct: 208-494-1260
https://airbridgebroadband.com | 231 W Main St, Grangeville, ID 83530
