I did just that a few minutes after the original email in this thread, it should have already been removed.
—srs ________________________________ From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+ops.lists=gmail....@nanog.org> on behalf of John Levine <jo...@iecc.com> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2024 9:00:01 AM To: nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Contact mail for Weekly Global Routing Table Report has ended up on Spamhaus HBL According to Philip Smith <pfsi...@gmail.com>: >Laura Smith wrote on 4/8/2024 19:42: >> Just as an FYI, it appears the pfsinoz -at- gmail.com address given in the >> Weekly Global Routing Table Report has sended up on the Spamhaus HBL list. >> >> You might want to fix this to ensure visibility of the reports are >> maintained. :) > >Sigh, yes, and the role account email address that posts the weekly >report too. :-( > >I'm open to ideas what to do next. You could go to Spamhaus' web site and put in a ticket telling them that it's a mistake. But no need, I did that a few hours ago and it's fixed. I expect it wasn't exactly a false positive, someone with an odd sense of humor probably put your address as a hashbuster in a spam run or something like that, but I pointed to RFC 9324 as an example of why it would be a good idea not to list it again. R's, John -- Regards, John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
