Hi, I would like to volunteer to help with bullet two: “DDoS mitigation. BCP38, 
communities for RTBH, packet scrubbing, etc. What can we do collectively?”.

-Rich


From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+rich_compton=comcast....@nanog.org> on behalf of 
Howard, Lee via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Friday, August 2, 2024 at 12:05 PM
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Norms and Standards
Last October at NANOG89 in San Diego, John Curran exhorted us to work 
together<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/youtu.be/U1Ip39Qv-Zk?feature=shared__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!CvvxNrHPzj7sjlrV8-3YxEA2AbO8sy-5tG4p2CFqz-PvU2jJTkdbz4Ag3lNojuxp5O9PagUfwH2LFVMcXQ$>
 to document best practices before governments developed their own.

John pointed out that in many industries, technical requirements and standards 
inform public policy goals, and vice versa. Then, when regulation is enacted, 
it refers to the standards developed by those technical experts. For example, 
the policy goal of protecting people from house fires is promoted through 
building codes (laws) which reference fire and electrical codes developed by 
standards bodies.

Governments are instituted by people to provide national defense, perform 
public services, protect children and vulnerable people, safeguard privacy and 
freedom, and prosecute those who transgress the above[1]. However, governments 
don’t operate the Internet, so when there are threats to or violations of the 
governmental role, they look to us. As John notes, they are increasingly 
looking at their roles with respect to the Internet.

If we don’t work together to provide tools to enable governments to fulfill 
their legitimate role, they will do what they think is best.

If we have agreed on some norms and standards, then they can point to those and 
say, “This looks like best practice.” In many cases, that gives us a safe 
harbor against additional action from governments—if I can show I’m following 
accepted best practices, I’m less of a target than my non-compliant competitors.

What should we work on together?

  *   We already have MANRS, KINDNS, some anti-spam (no open relays, block port 
25, etc.).
  *   DDoS mitigation. BCP38, communities for RTBH, packet scrubbing, etc. What 
can we do collectively?
  *   Infrastructure protection. Best practices for protecting your devices and 
services.
  *   Critical infrastructure protection. Do we have a role in protecting power 
plants, hospitals, etc., more than others?
  *   Net neutrality. Is there more than just “don’t inspect above L3”? Do CDNs 
or caches privilege some content unfairly?
  *   IPv6? The government angle is mostly anti-CGN, but this is a greater 
problem outside this region.
  *   Other ideas?

If a group of people can pick one topic and start documenting best practices, 
we may be able to do something good. I’m not worried about process yet: content 
first.

Is there a topic above, or another one, on which folks would like to 
collaborate to describe best practices?

Lee

[1] Even if you disagree that there is a legitimate role for governments, they 
think they have these roles, and they have the power to compel.

Reply via email to