On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 8:11 AM James Jun <[email protected]> wrote: > You (AS11875) have an operational need for good connectivity > into 3356 but, you made a poor purchasing decision by buying > IP transit for 11875 from a provider who has 10-AS path into > 3356 instead of <=3 AS path. You've done a _bad_ job here > in selecting an inferior pathway into 3356, and what you > SHOULD have done is to select an IP transit provider who > has an optimal AS-path into 3356 to meet your operational > need of having good connectivity into 3356.
Sophistry. I buy IP transit from 3 providers, one of which has a 3 AS path to 3356. -Bill -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/
