> > t's certainly one of many possible root causes which someone doing an > AAR on an event like this should be thinking about, and looking for in > their > evaluation of the data they see. >
And I'm sure they are and will. By the time that post was made, the vendor had shared multiple updates about what the actual cause seemed to be, which were very plausible. An unaffiliated 3rd party stating 'maybe an attack!' when there has been no observation or information shared that even remotely points to that simply spreads FUD for no reason. I respectfully disagree. On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 1:22 AM Jay R. Ashworth <j...@baylink.com> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Tom Beecher" <beec...@beecher.cc> > > To: "Lamar Owen" <lo...@pari.edu> > > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 8:06:07 PM > > Subject: Re: "Hypothetical" Datacenter Overheating > > >> If these chillers are connected to BACnet or similar network, then I > >> wouldn't rule out the possibility of an attack. > > > > Don't insinuate something like this without evidence. Completely > > unreasonable and inappropriate. > > WADR, horsecrap. > > It's certainly one of many possible root causes which someone doing an > AAR on an event like this should be thinking about, and looking for in > their > evaluation of the data they see. > > He didn't *accuse* anyone, which would be out of bounds. > > Cheers, > -- jra > -- > Jay R. Ashworth Baylink > j...@baylink.com > Designer The Things I Think RFC > 2100 > Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land > Rover DII > St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 > 1274 >
