Crap, that was supposed to be private.
scott
On 10/12/23 11:29 PM, scott via NANOG wrote:
UGH, you called me out and I have no defense. I was thinking of our
non-NAT customers.
scott
On 10/12/23 11:20 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
On 13 Oct 2023, at 08:31, scott <sur...@mauigateway.com> wrote:
On 10/11/23 7:47 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
Virtually no home network on the planet has fully functional IPv4
available to it.
Hawaiian Telcom customers have it. No blocks at all.
So they don’t use NAT? The internet is a peer-to-peer network. NAT
breaks that.
But I can’t reach IPv6 devices on the Internet from my IPv4 device
without a transition box is no
different to I can’t reach IPv4 devices on the Internet from my IPv4
device because PNAT *is* a
transition device. It’s a bogus complaint and I’m calling it out.
scott
