Mark Tinka wrote:
Are you saying you thought a 100G Ethernet link actually consisting
of 4 parallel 25G links, which is an example of "equal speed multi
parallel point to point links", were relying on hashing?
No...
So, though you wrote:
>> If you have multiple parallel links over which many slow
>> TCP connections are running, which should be your assumption,
>> the proper thing to do is to use the links with round robin
>> fashion without hashing. Without buffer bloat, packet
>> reordering probability within each TCP connection is
>> negligible.
>
> So you mean, what... per-packet load balancing, in lieu of per-flow
> load balancing?
you now recognize that per-flow load balancing is not a very
good idea.
Good.
you are saying that.
See above to find my statement of "without hashing".
Masataka Ohta
