Job Snijders via NANOG writes:
 > >
 > > > Would it not be advantageous to create at a minimum the 256 of the
 > > > 'least-specific' objects?
 > > 
 > > MK: That may be a reasonable approach. Do you see any adverse effects
 > > in simplifying the IRR Route creation logic to just have
 > > least-specific?
 > 
 > I don't think I see a downside of mapping a single VRP to a single IRR
 > route/route6 object.
 > 

I agree that in ARIN's RPKI-->IRR synthesis, the set of route[6]
objects created should not depend on the maxlength used.  In Mark's
phrasing, "just have least-specific."

Ideally, discussion about details such as this should have occurred on
some ARIN technical mailing list in the months leading up to ARIN
deploying this change to production.

Thanks.

                                                Jay B.


Reply via email to