Job Snijders via NANOG writes: > > > > > Would it not be advantageous to create at a minimum the 256 of the > > > 'least-specific' objects? > > > > MK: That may be a reasonable approach. Do you see any adverse effects > > in simplifying the IRR Route creation logic to just have > > least-specific? > > I don't think I see a downside of mapping a single VRP to a single IRR > route/route6 object. >
I agree that in ARIN's RPKI-->IRR synthesis, the set of route[6] objects created should not depend on the maxlength used. In Mark's phrasing, "just have least-specific." Ideally, discussion about details such as this should have occurred on some ARIN technical mailing list in the months leading up to ARIN deploying this change to production. Thanks. Jay B.