Go for it. I’m sure NTS’ complexity clocks lots of hours for expensive consultants :)
Me, I’m sticking with GPS.) -mel via cell On Aug 8, 2023, at 11:34 AM, Rubens Kuhl <rube...@gmail.com> wrote: So little deployment that has 3500 occurrences according to shodan.io<http://shodan.io>. With such few choices, It should be hard to find suitable options. Rubens Em ter., 8 de ago. de 2023 13:02, Mel Beckman <m...@beckman.org<mailto:m...@beckman.org>> escreveu: I’m familiar with NTS, which is pointedly not NTP. That’s like saying “TCP port 80 can be made secure,: just use a VPN!” Perhaps when NTS is widely deployed it will be an option. As the RFC was only approved in 2020, that will probably take a decade. Or more. (I’m talking about you, IPv6 :) Not to mention the complexity or NTS for hardware implementation in network elements, a primary application (https://tinyurl.com/ntsishard). -mel > On Aug 8, 2023, at 8:26 AM, Rubens Kuhl > <rube...@gmail.com<mailto:rube...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 12:12 PM Mel Beckman > <m...@beckman.org<mailto:m...@beckman.org>> wrote: >> >> Until the Internet NTP network can be made secure, no. > > Internet NTP can be made secure, it's called NTS. > https://developers.cloudflare.com/time-services/nts/ describes it with > links to the RFC, and describes one of the many NTP servers that is > available with NTS, time.cloudflare.com<http://time.cloudflare.com>. I > already mentioned 5 others, > and there are many more than those 6. > > > Rubens
