On 1/22/23 3:05 PM, Matthew Petach wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 2:45 PM Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote:
I read in the Economist that the gen of starlink satellites will have
the ability to route messages between each satellite. Would
conventional
routing protocols be up to such a challenge? Or would it have to be
custom made for that problem? And since a lot of companies and
countries
are getting on that action, it seems like fertile ground for (bad)
wheel
reinvention?
Mike
Unlike most terrestrial links, the distances between satellites are
not fixed,
and thus the latency between nodes is variable, making the concept of
"Shortest Path First" calculation a much more dynamic and challenging
one to keep current, as the latency along a path may be constantly
changing
as the satellite nodes move relative to each other, without any link
state actually
changing to trigger a new SPF calculation.
One thing that is in their favor is that while they are moving, they are
moving in a predictable manner. It seems that each router could,
essentially, locally update routes until they are told otherwise?
I suspect a form of OLSR might be more advantageous in a dynamic partial
mesh between satellites, but I haven't given it as much deep thought
as would
be necessary to form an informed opinion.
So, yes--it's likely the routing protocol used will not be entirely
"off-the-shelf"
but will instead incorporate continuous latency information in the LSDB,
and path selection will be time-bound based on the rate of increase in
latency
along currently-selected edges in the graph.
Has IETF looked at this, do you know? Even if the routers can't
interoperate with other systems, it would be good to have some routing
clue with a lot of eyeballs on it to not make rookie mistakes.
Mike
