I do not understand why you believe that only AD matters, if the real management is done mostly by Chairs. Ed/ -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+vasilenko.eduard=huawei....@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker Sent: Friday, November 4, 2022 7:34 PM To: Donald Eastlake <d3e...@gmail.com> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Jon Postel Re: 202210301538.AYC
Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways... > On Nov 2, 2022, at 5:50 PM, Donald Eastlake <d3e...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In the early years of the > NomCom, I believe there were a small number of cases of a 3 year term > but only for an AD who had already successfully served for 2 years. There were two such cases - Jeff Schiller and myself. The situation was that in 1997 (IIRC) we had four areas with a single AD, and the IESG told the nomcom that the imbalance was strange. At its option, the nomcom could extend the term of a sitting AD that wasn’t up for renewal/replacement by one year to even things out. They did. In 2001, I resigned, and I think Jeff resigned in 1999.
