Thanks for the shoutout, Norman. Preseem isn’t at 50Gbps in 1U yet, but we will get there.
I hope more folks listen to Dave, open vs. closed source solutions aside — AQM makes a shocking amount of difference to quality of experience. Jeremy On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 2:14 PM Norman Jester <n...@ancientalien.com> wrote: > > > On Sep 18, 2022, at 12:25 PM, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > There's been a huge uptake in interest lately in doing better per > > device and per customer shaping, especially for > > ISPs, in the libreQoS.io project, which is leveraging the best ideas > > bufferbloat project members have had over the > > past decade (cake, bpf, xdp) to push an x86 middlebox well past the > > 10Gbit barrier, on sub-2k boxes, with really > > good stats on backlogs, drops, and ecn marks. I've long primarily > > tried to get fq_codel and cake running on the CPE (most recently > > mikrotik), and that's been taking too long. > > > > I have no idea to what extent members of this list have interest in > > this, but if you know of a smaller ISP with bad bufferbloat, > > please pass that link along? It's got ridiculously easier to set up as > > a vm of late. > > > > There is presently a design discussion going on over here: > > > > https://github.com/rchac/LibreQoS/issues/57 > > > > And by mentioning it here, today, I'm mostly asking what other real > > life use cases we should try to tackle? What backend tools should we > > try to integrate with? > > > > -- > > FQ World Domination pending: > https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/ > > Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC > > Take a look at Preseem as the features it has and graphs are great. WISPs > need this type of system and would show added interest if it has those > charts and metrics. The integrations are good also. HubSpot integration is > a plus so we can pull user data out of it and add it to their HubSpot > profiles. > > -- Jeremy Austin jhaus...@gmail.com
