You keep using the term “imaginary” when presented with evidence that does not match your view of things.
There are many REAL scenarios where single flow high throughout TCP is a real requirements as well as high throughput extremely small packet size. In the case of the later, the market is extremely large, but it’s not Internet traffic. Shane > On Aug 8, 2022, at 7:34 AM, Masataka Ohta <mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> > wrote: > > Saku Ytti wrote: > >>> which is, unlike Yttinet, the reality. >> Yttinet has pesky customers who care about single TCP performance over >> long fat links, and observe poor performance with shallow buffers at >> the provider end. > > With such an imaginary assumption, according to the end to end > principle, the customers (the ends) should use paced TCP instead > of paying unnecessarily bloated amount of money to intelligent > intermediate entities of ISPs using expensive routers with > bloated buffers. > >> Yttinet is cost sensitive and does not want to do >> work, unless sufficiently motivated by paying customers. > > I understand that if customers follow the end to end principle, > revenue of "intelligent" ISPs will be reduced. > > Masataka Ohta > > >
