On 7/22/22 4:00 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022, Michael Thomas wrote:
Basically the jist that it's fake auto warranty fraud calls. Or is
this just requiring providers to do the forensics whichever way to
enforce this?
https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/21/tech/fcc-robocall-crackdown/index.html
As always speak with your corporate attorney or a licensed attorney
familar with communications law.
The FCC order is under the TRACED Act of 2019. The order doesn't
depend on STIR/SHAKEN. The Traceback Consortium and providers use a
variety of methods to identify the calls.
"By this Order, the Bureau directs all U.S.-based voice service
providers to investigate promptly the apparently illegal robocall
traffic identified in section II.A. above. We further direct all voice
service providers that locate any of the apparently illegal robocall
traffic
described in this Order to take immediate steps to effectively
mitigate and prevent further transmission of the apparently unlawful
calls."
[...]
"If the voice service provider concludes that the identified traffic
was not illegal, the report must include an explanation as to why the
provider has reasonably concluded that the identified calls were not
illegal and what steps the voice service provider took to reach that
conclusion."
[...]
The order is available
https://www.fcc.gov/document/robocall-enforcement-order-all-us-based-voice-service-providers
So the FCC could have done this well before with routes that don't
involve crypto authentication? That's what I've always assumed.
Mike
