As of last week our discussions with the FCC have still not determined the official ruling. Again, my personal opinion is that it will not require a PE stamp but rather depend on an individual to be a professional engineer.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 3:39 PM Andrew Latham <lath...@gmail.com> wrote: > Josh, you are correct, I linked to the wrong document. > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 1:36 PM Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > >> Andrew, >> >> Where does it say that it is or is not required? This is a request for >> clarification filed by the CCA. >> >> On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 1:59 PM Andrew Latham <lath...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I read https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-22-543A1.pdf and a PE >>> is not required. >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 9:47 AM KCI Dave Logan via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all. We operate a small regional ISP in Colorado, but no size is >>>> too small to ignore the FCC, as you all know. >>>> >>>> We're really struggling to find the required engineer for the filing, >>>> and we're small enough that we don't have an officer with engineering >>>> credentials. >>>> >>>> Any pointers in the CO/WY/NE/KS area would be great, on or off list. >>>> >>>> I sure hope we're the only org with this problem still, and all the >>>> rest of you are good to go. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> dave >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Dave Logan >>>> Kentec Communications, Inc. >>>> 970-522-8107 >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> - Andrew "lathama" Latham - >>> >> > > -- > - Andrew "lathama" Latham - >
