> On Mar 30, 2022, at 08:09 , Jared Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > > Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: >>>> When your ISP starts charging $X/Month for legacy protocol support >>> >>> Out of interest, how would this come about? >> >> ISPs are facing ever growing costs to continue providing IPv4 services. > Could you please be more specific about which costs you are referring to? Costs of address acquisition Costs of CGNAT systems in lieu of address acquisition costs Costs of increasing support calls due to IPv4 life support measures in other networks. etc. > It's not like IP transit providers care if they deliver IPv4 or IPv6 bits to > you. True, but adding customers requires additional addresses at some point. IPv6 addresses are cheap compared to IPv4 addresses. Owen
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown
- Re: V6 still not supported Randy Carpenter
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown
- Re: V6 still not supp... Randy Carpenter
- Re: V6 still not ... Jared Brown
- Re: V6 still not ... Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: V6 still not supp... John Kristoff
- Re: V6 still not ... Christopher Morrow
- Re: V6 still not supp... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown
- Re: V6 still not supp... Abraham Y. Chen
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown
- Re: V6 still not supported JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
- Re: V6 still not supported JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown

