On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 1:23 PM Daryl G. Jurbala <da...@introspect.net> wrote:
> The last time I worked with vMX was several years ago. The image was > outdated to the point of having to fire up an older version of VMWare to > export the two VMs so I could import them back into 6. The > documentation barely existed. I had to figure out which vmware adapters > corresponded to which vMX adapters. No one really seemed to be able to > help at Juniper, even though we ended up licensing the things so we were > "real" customers of this product. > > It looked a lot lot an abandoned project. So unless something has > changed in the last few years it's not looking good. > Interesting. I haven't had an opportunity to try vMX because of its lack of Hyper-V support, but we do run vSRX in production quite a bit including junos versions from 17.x up to 21.x. It's kind of janky on Hyper-V but works overall (the main issue being very very long boot times - 15+ minutes to get up and running), but we also run it on KVM on Linux with the "vSRX3" images, and that works a lot better. The vSRX3 images on KVM, I personally haven't run into any issues with. The licensing costs are pretty reasonable, too, imho. Good luck with what you're trying to accomplish: maybe give the vSRX series a shot if you're running on KVM. - mdh Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead 816-256-5446|Direct Looking for help? Helpdesk|Email Support We build customized end-to-end technology solutions powered by NetFire Cloud.