It appears that Anne Mitchell <amitch...@isipp.com> said: >> Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>, Greg Skinner <gregskinn...@icloud.com>, >> "Karandikar, Abhay" <direc...@iitk.ac.in>, Rama Ati ><rama_...@outlook.com>, Bob Corner GMAIL <bobbiecor...@gmail.com>, "Hsing, T. >Russell" <ths...@ieee.org>, "Chen, Henry C.J." ><hcjc...@avinta.com>, ST Hsieh <uschinae...@gmail.com>, "Chen, Abraham Y." ><ayc...@alum.mit.edu> >> > >This is a whole lot of cc:s to people who aren't even part of this group/list. > One wonders with this many cc:s, how many bcc:s there also were, and to whom.
There are several thousand people on the NANOG list, and public web archives. I don't think this is a useful question. FWIW, I also don't think that repurposing 240/4 is a good idea. To be useful it would require that every host on the Internet update its network stack, which would take on the order of a decade, to free up some space that would likely be depleted in a year or two. It's basically the same amount of work as getting everything to work on IPv6. R's, John
