I would be more than happy to consilolidate my ipv6 addresses under my lrsa, but ARIN will not allow it.
Owen > On Dec 4, 2021, at 17:43, John Curran <jcur...@arin.net> wrote: > > Yes Owen, that is correct… > > If an organization insists on maintaining multiple contractual relationships > with ARIN (for whatever reason) then they will be billed for each relation > separately - and that is indeed likely to be more than having a single > consolidated agreement for all number resources. > > Thanks, > /John > > John Curran > President and CEO > American Registry for Internet Numbers > >>> On Dec 4, 2021, at 7:09 PM, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: >>> >> >> >>>> On Dec 4, 2021, at 8:59 AM, John Curran <jcur...@arin.net> wrote: >>> >>> Just for clarity - ARIN’s fee schedule is such that ISP customers (i.e. >>> those with registration service plans) pay an annual services fee based on >>> their higher category of IPv4 or IPv6 resources – i.e. those with IPv4 >>> resources can obtain a corresponding size of IPv6 resources without any >>> change in size category or increase in their annual fee. >>> >>> [Also worth noting - as of January 2022, all end-user customers are moving >>> to the same registration services plan, and similarly those with just IPv4 >>> number resources be able to obtain corresponding IPv6 resources without >>> change to their annual fee.] >> >> This, whether they want to or not… In many cases resulting in significant >> unwanted fee increases, especially if you have a mix of resources covered >> under RSA and LRSA due to ARIN’s accounting limitations that they are >> perversely disincentivized against fixing because it allows them to >> essentially double-bill. >> >> Owen >>> >>
