On 11/27/21 17:07, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Because lengthy IPv6 addresses mean a lot more opex than IPv4.
I disagree - it can be more opex if you want to run both together, but less so if you choose one; largely IPv6, but also largely IPv4 if you don't intend to be in the game for the rest of your life.
My point was that there might not obviously be a linear relationship between less CG-NAT and more native IPv6, that makes a material difference to the CFO's Excel spreadsheet, off the bat.
Mark.
