On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 4:47 PM Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote:
> > > On Oct 8, 2021, at 12:39 PM, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 2:39 PM Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> > wrote: > >> I see this as a way to allow NANOG to help channel some of ICANN’s >> incredible excess of funding >> towards more useful pursuits than those ICANN has endowed so far. >> > > > https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-and-first-sign-memorandum-of-understanding-on-dns-threats-mitigation-22-5-2020-en > > > https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-signs-memorandum-of-understanding-with-the-georgian-national-communications-commission-7-12-2020-en > > > https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/gsma-and-icann-sign-memorandum-of-understanding-at-gsma-mobile-world-congress-28-2-2018-en > > > https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-signs-memorandum-of-understanding-with-the-global-cyber-alliance-16-6-2020-en > > I suspect that if you think that this will make it rain, you will be sadly > disappointed... > > > I don’t expect it will do any good at all. I hope that it will be slightly > less damaging than the things ICANN > usually spends money on. > I had some time on my hands early this morning and did a close reading. There'a typo in Article 3 Section 1. Seems like it was more about the education program than anything. I trust NANOG to be less destructive than ICANN and as near as I can tell, > this partnership is mostly ICANN funding > and NANOG doing. > See Article 4. *The Parties agree to use their own funds or financial resources to fulfill their respective responsibilities under this MoU*. This MoU shall not cause any financial obligations on any one of the Parties hereto as a result of enforcing any of its rights or executing any of its obligations hereunder. It's a nice letter from ICANN supporting the education program for the most part. Warm regards, -M<
