On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 3:02 PM Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote:
> > Heh, NAT is not that evil after all. Do you expect that all the home > > people will get routable public IPs for all they toys inside house? > > in ipv6 they can. and it can have consequences, see > > NATting Else Matters: Evaluating IPv6 Access Control Policies in > Residential Networks; > Karl Olson, Jack Wampler, Fan Shen, and Nolen Scaife > > > https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-030-72582-2_22.pdf > > the ietf did not give guidance to cpe vendors to protect toys inside > your LAN > > guidance aside... 'Time To Market' (or "Minimum Viable Product - MVP!) is likely to impact all of our security 'requirements'. :( I also thought 'homenet' (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/homenet) was supposed to have provided the guidance you seek here?
