> On Sep 24, 2021, at 3:35 PM, Niels Bakker <niels=na...@bakker.net> wrote: > > * c...@cmadams.net (Chris Adams) [Sat 25 Sep 2021, 00:17 CEST]: >> Which - why do I have to order different part numbers for back to front >> airflow? It's just a fan, can't it be made reversible? Seems like that >> would be cheaper than stocking alternate part numbers. > > The fan is inside the power supply right next to the high-voltage capacitors. > You shouldn't be near that without proper training. Meh… Turn off power supply input switch, open chassis carefully, apply high-wattage 1Ω resistor across capacitor terminals for 10 seconds. There isn’t going to be any high voltage left after that. Owen > > > -- Niels.
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Alain Hebert
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Brandon Butterworth
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Jay Hennigan
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Denis Fondras
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Martin Hannigan
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment William Herrin
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Chris Adams
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Niels Bakker
- Re: Rack rails on network equipm... William Herrin
- Re: Rack rails on network equipm... Chris Adams
- Re: Rack rails on network equipm... Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: Rack rails on network eq... Bryan Fields
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Sabri Berisha
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Mauricio Rodriguez via NANOG
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Randy Carpenter
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Lady Benjamin Cannon
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment richey goldberg
- RE: Rack rails on network equipment Kevin Menzel via NANOG
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Doug McIntyre
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Joe Greco
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment George Herbert