All this is resolved using IPv6-only and IPv4aaS, the same way as cellular 
providers are doing with 464XLAT.

This means you don't need to invest in more IPv4 addressses (at some point you 
can even transfer some of them to the laggers), you still provide IPv4 service 
to the edge, but the access is IPv4-ignorant.
 
Reduced Capex and Opex in general.
 

El 6/9/21 9:29, "NANOG en nombre de Saku Ytti" 
<nanog-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel...@nanog.org en nombre de s...@ytti.fi> 
escribió:

    On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 10:20, Bjørn Mork <bj...@mork.no> wrote:

    > Adding new access infrastructure of any sort (Fixed Wireless is the
    > hype...)?  Why would you want to continue being stupid even if you
    > implemented dual-stack for all your fibre, hfc and dsl customers?  You
    > can save a lot by dropping dual-stack complexities in PGWs and FWA CPEs,
    > even if we assume most of the fibre/hfc/dsl value chain is reused.

    Can you? You need to offer IPv4 anyhow and all the complexities
    related to that, i.e. some stateful box. Why would I offer in addition
    to that IPv6, which is not being requested by anyone. And by anyone I
    mean anyone I want as customer, as those who request it, are probably
    going to be expensive to support and I need to subsidise those with my
    regular customers, so I'd rather not cater to those.



    -- 
      ++ytti



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.



Reply via email to