>> It was intended to be an IPv4 replacement to provide connectivity.
>> Do majority of smart handsets OS today support v6?
> Actually, yes. Many mobile networks are all v6 internally with NAT to
> external v4 sites.
what i love most about the why ipv6 {has not deployed | does not work
for me | must be used immediately if not sooner | ...} is that it
provides such a rich field for posting to nanog etc. and folk think of
new brilliant discussion points every day. </snark>
randy
---
[email protected]
`gpg --locate-external-keys --auto-key-locate wkd [email protected]`
signatures are back, thanks to dmarc header butchery
