Verizon Executive Relations team reached out to their network team and the finding is that Tencent is not announcing the prefixes to them. Result: Verizon is not going to pursue this.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:11 PM Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 11:35:35AM -0400, > S Umple <sum...@gmail.com> wrote > a message of 61 lines which said: > > > <VZ INET router># > > 81.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2835 subnets, 14 masks > > 121.51.0.0/16 <empty> > > 182.254.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks > > > > > > route-views.routeviews.org> > > 81.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3247 subnets, 19 masks > > 121.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2571 subnets, 18 masks > > 182.254.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 113 subnets, 5 masks > > > > Anyone able to validate my findings, and/or take this issue to higher VZ > > support? > > Testing with the RIPE Atlas probes show that 121.51.0.13 (which is > pingable) is not reachable at all from AS 701. But it still has > reachability problems from other networks in the world, with many > timeouts (but the problem at 701 is more radical). > > At least 121.51.0.0/16 and 121.51.0.0/23 seems to be seen in many > places. >
