Turns out the apply-group isn't working for v6 rules. ATAC made me replicate the same rule directly under routing-options and inet6flow.0 appeared and I can see my rule populated now.
FYI I'm running vRR 20.4R1-S1.2 On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 4:55 AM Zbyněk Pospíchal <zby...@dialtelecom.cz> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > with no v6 fs rules, the table inet6flow.0 stay hidden. Try to make any. > > -- > S pozdravem/Best Regards, > Zbyněk > > > > Dne 21.05.21 v 20:10 Eric Dugas via NANOG napsal(a): > > Hello, > > > > I've been fiddling with JunOS to enable Flowspec IPv6. According to the > > docs, it was implemented in 16.x. I've tried to set it up in vRR and vMX > > in the 20.x train. Everything commit just fine, I get the inetflow.0 for > > IPv4 but inet6flow.0 is not appearing. > > > > I already have a JTAC case (now escalated to ATAC) but I am looking for > > plan B. > > > > Has anyone implemented Flowspec v6? I was thinking about FRRouting but I > > wanted to get some feedback from the community before spending more > > hours into this. > > > > Thanks > > Eric > >
