On 4/26/2021 5:30 PM, George Metz wrote:
First you say "not at all" and then you say "stop complying". If your
employees stop complying
with the orders coming from the angry men with guns held to said
employees' heads, someone's
going to get shot - and it's going to be the telecom employees. That's
significantly more than a
financial hardship and I cannot grasp how you think it could possibly
be otherwise.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last post on this for me...
Dang this went off the rails fast! The main point was 'when you're
thinking you're having a bad
day think about what these network operators are going through', but you
and Mel seemed to
have missed that part.
Additionally, I did not mean the -employees- should say no to the
gunmen. That's ridiculous to
think I meant they should die for internet connectivity to remain on! I
meant the -companies-
should stop facilitating the repression by complying "...with numerous
demands from the military,
including instructions to cut off the internet each night for the past
week, and block specific
websites, such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram." This means the
companies should stop
selling to the military there. But that was an aside to the above.
I can pass packets pretty well, but the evidence seems to show I am a
pretty crappy communicator.
scott
