What offended you? The term “Global Warmist”? It’s an accurate description of people who hold that climate change is causing more frequent and severe weather, due to heating of the atmosphere.
And your argument about “Forbes for something related to science” fails on the classic logical fallacy “appeal to authority”. Just because Forbes states easily verifiable public facts doesn’t make them untrustworthy. Scientific knowledge is best established by evidence and experiment rather than argued through authority by “consensus”. Science is not a consensus enterprise. -mel > On Feb 22, 2021, at 10:16 AM, Brandon Svec via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > > > >> On Feb 22, 2021, at 9:56 AM, Mel Beckman <m...@beckman.org> wrote: >> >> Sorry Global Warmists, > > > Stopped taking you seriously or reading further right there. Well, that and > linking to Forbes for something related to science. > > Best.
