Sorry wasn’t meant directly aimed at you… unless you are the same person \?

> On Feb 5, 2021, at 09:12, J. Hellenthal <jhellent...@dataix.net> wrote:
> 
> And just like deploying IoT devices in vehicles without proper security 
> preparations will lead you to a C&C network … just saying the hammer swings 
> both ways here and getting a IP reported isn’t going to do you any damn good 
> at ALL.
> 
> Personally I’d rip those IoT vehicles off the market for a recall but I 
> suspect we’ll be hearing of that in the not to distant future.
> 
> So in hindsight why don’t we just close down this thread here.
> 
>> On Feb 5, 2021, at 08:50, Joe <jbfixu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Much like your banning of an email address is an ability you have with your 
>> provider (gmail), you should have the same abilities with your cellular 
>> provider for an IP address. 
>> I would think (at a minimum) you would be able to negotiate such an action 
>> with them, perhaps it is time to re-negotiate that contract?
>> If your simply trying to report an offending IP for brute force stuff 
>> perhaps the tact you may find more helpful is to ask for a contact at xzy 
>> ISP on list, versus asking folks to do reporting for you. As well there are 
>> like 100s of lists to report this to outside of NANOG  
>> As well, if I am reading this correctly, deployment of devices that have 
>> public facing IPs and do not have a means to protect themselves is 
>> concerning to say the least. 
>> This is about as reckless as putting up a login page without a password and 
>> crying foul when something gains access that you didn't expect. Again, I do 
>> not know all of the details of this so I may be way off base with that 
>> respect. 
>> 
>> If your ability to prevent issues is due to lack of a firewall/control to 
>> your network, possibly asking for help in mitigating such threats would be 
>> better, as there are a lot of very well versed/clever folks that help out.
>> Regards,
>> -Joe
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 7:17 PM JoeSox <joe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ryan,
>> Thanks but like I said these devices are in moving vehicles ok?
>> I stated we have a plan but it is ways out.  
>> FACT: we have a known malicious C&C
>> FACT: We know what networks it is hitting and the cellular network is the 
>> most vulnerable, imo.
>> FACT: this IP is against Verizon terms of service so the way to address it 
>> is to report it to them as they request.
>> 
>> I honestly got what I needed from this thread, thanks. And I thank the 
>> nonbullies that helped me off list.
>> --
>> Thank You,
>> Joe 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 5:11 PM Ryan Hamel <administra...@rkhtech.org> wrote:
>> Joe,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> It isn’t on Verizon to setup a firewall, especially if you have a direct 
>> public IP service. The device being attached directly to the Internet (no 
>> matter the transmission medium), must be able to protect itself. ISPs 
>> provide routers which function as a NAT/Firewall appliance, to provide a 
>> means of safety and convenience for them, but also charge you a rental fee.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Stick a Cradlepoint router or something in front of your device, if you want 
>> an external means of protection. Otherwise you’ll need to enable the Windows 
>> Firewall if it’s a Windows system, or setup iptables on Linux, ipfw/pf on 
>> *BSD, etc.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Ryan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: JoeSox <joe...@gmail.com> 
>> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 5:04 PM
>> To: r...@rkhtech.org
>> Cc: TJ Trout <t...@pcguys.us>; NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
>> Subject: Re: Suspicious IP reporting
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> How do I setup a firewall when I am not a Verizon engineer?
>> 
>> There is a firewall via the antivirus and operating system but that's it.
>> 
>> Do you not understand my issue? I thought that is the real problem with the 
>> online bullies in this thread.
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Thank You,
>> 
>> Joe
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 5:01 PM Ryan Hamel <administra...@rkhtech.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Joe,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The underlying premise here is, “pick your battles”. If you don’t want an IP 
>> address to access your device in anyway, setup a firewall and properly 
>> configure it to accept whitelisted traffic only, or just expose a VPN 
>> endpoint. The Internet is full of both good and bad actors that probe and 
>> scan anything and everything.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> While some appreciate the notification here, others will find it annoying. 
>> We cannot report anything malicious about an IP address on the Internet, 
>> unless it does harm to us specifically, otherwise it is false reporting and 
>> does create more noise at the ISP, and waste more time getting to the 
>> underlying issue.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Ryan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+ryan=rkhtech....@nanog.org> On Behalf Of JoeSox
>> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 4:41 PM
>> To: TJ Trout <t...@pcguys.us>
>> Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
>> Subject: Re: Suspicious IP reporting
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Do others see this online bully started by Tom? The leader has spoken so the 
>> minions follow :)
>> 
>> This list  sometimes LOL
>> 
>> I think if everyone gets off their high horse, the list communication would 
>> be less noisy for the list veterans.
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Thank You,
>> 
>> Joe
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 4:36 PM TJ Trout <t...@pcguys.us> wrote:
>> 
>> This seems like a highly suspect request coming from a North American 
>> network operator...? 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:23 AM JoeSox <joe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> This IP is hitting devices on cellular networks for the past day or so.
>> 
>>  https://www.abuseipdb.com/whois/79.124.62.86  
>> 
>> I think this is the info to report it to the ISP.  Any help or if everyone 
>> can report it, I would be a happy camper.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ab...@4cloud.mobi; ab...@fiberinternet.bg
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> https://en.asytech.cn/check-ip/79.124.62.25#gsc.tab=0
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Thank You,
>> 
>> Joe
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> J. Hellenthal
> 
> The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a 
> lot about anticipated traffic volume.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 

J. Hellenthal

The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a 
lot about anticipated traffic volume.






Reply via email to