I agree 100%. I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine. What I don't appreciate is that now my email address is in some politico's address list because of someone's behavior.
- Javier On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:20 PM Jon Lewis <jle...@lewis.org> wrote: > There's a world of difference between "don't expect list posts to be > private to list members" and "don't forward the list to autoresponders." > The stupidity of the latter, if it can be tracked down to who did it, > should result in their removal from the list, at least until they explain > what caused them to do that and have undone it. > > On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Paul Timmins wrote: > > > The list has public archives. Draw your own conclusions on the policy. > > > > https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/ > > > > On 1/18/21 2:40 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote: > >> Not under that impression at all. That's very different from "what is > the > >> policy" - at least in the groups I run, if the policy is "no sharing > >> offlist" and then someone does, there are consequences for that > someone. > >> Anne > >> > >> -- > >> Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law > >> Dean of Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School > >> Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam > law) > >> Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange > >> Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop > >> Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS) > >> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route > StackPath, Sr. Neteng | therefore you are > _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ >
