It's not, and frankly it's disappointing to see people pushing an agenda here.
Scott Helms On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 9:37 AM <sro...@ronan-online.com> wrote: > > NANOG is a group of Operators, discussion does not have to be about > networking. I have already explained how this represents a significant issue > for Network Operators. > > On Jan 10, 2021, at 9:09 AM, Mike Bolitho <mikeboli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It has nothing to do with networking. Their decision was necessarily > political. If you can specifically bring up an issue, beyond speculative, on > how their new chosen CDN is somehow now causing congestion or routing issues > on the public internet, then great. But as of now, that isn't even a thing. > It's just best to leave it alone because it will devolve into chaos. > > - Mike Bolitho > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 6:54 AM <sro...@ronan-online.com> wrote: >> >> Why? This is extremely relevant to network operators and is not political at >> all. >> >> On Jan 10, 2021, at 8:51 AM, Mike Bolitho <mikeboli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> Can we please not go down this rabbit hole on here? List admins? >> >> - Mike Bolitho >> >> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 1:26 AM William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: >>> >>> Anybody looking for a new customer opportunity? It seems Parler is in >>> search of a new service provider. Vendors need only provide all the >>> proprietary AWS APIs that Parler depends upon to function. >>> >>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/01/09/amazon-parler-suspension/ >>> >>> Regards, >>> Bill HErrin
