Yes, significantly. Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 10, 2021, at 10:10 AM, Matt Hoppes <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> > wrote: > > Is that illegal though? > >> On Jan 10, 2021, at 10:07 AM, sro...@ronan-online.com wrote: >> >> Another interesting angle here is that it as ruled President couldn’t block >> people, because his Tweets were government communication. So has Twitter now >> blocked government communication? >> >> >>>> On Jan 10, 2021, at 9:51 AM, Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> On 1/10/21 5:42 AM, sro...@ronan-online.com wrote: >>>> While Amazon is absolutely within their rights to suspend anyone they want >>>> for violation of their TOS, it does create an interesting problem. Amazon >>>> is now in the content moderation business, which could potentially open >>>> them up to liability if they fail to suspend any other customer who hosts >>>> objectionable content. >>>> >>>> When I actively hosted USENET servers, I was repeatedly warned by in-house >>>> and external counsel, not to moderate which groups I hosted based on >>>> content, less I become responsible for moderating all groups, shouldn’t >>>> that same principal apply to platforms like AWS and Twitter? >>> >>> >>> Is it content moderation, or just giving the boot to enabling criminal >>> activity? Would that more providers be given the boot for enabling voice >>> spam scams, for example. Didn't one of the $n-chan's get the boot a while >>> back? I don't seem to recall a lot of push back about that and it was >>> pretty much the same situation, iirc. >>> >>> Mike >>>
