Yes, it seems subsection (c)(2)(b) gives them cover, perhaps it’s time that this is revised, less the Internet content become moderated by a small group of private platform owners.
Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 10, 2021, at 9:05 AM, Daniel Jurado <jurad...@mail.com> wrote: > > > Government made it political. > Parler is free conservative speech that the MSM doesn't control. > CNN stated that it was a threat to democracy because they didn't have control > over what was posted like Twitter or Facebook. > So at this point it is 100% political. > > -- > Sent from my Android phone with mail.com Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >> On 1/10/21, 8:57 AM sro...@ronan-online.com wrote: >> Why? This is extremely relevant to network operators and is not political at >> all. >> >> On Jan 10, 2021, at 8:51 AM, Mike Bolitho <mikeboli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> Can we please not go down this rabbit hole on here? List admins? >> >> - Mike Bolitho >> >>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 1:26 AM William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: >>> Anybody looking for a new customer opportunity? It seems Parler is in >>> search of a new service provider. Vendors need only provide all the >>> proprietary AWS APIs that Parler depends upon to function. >>> >>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/01/09/amazon-parler-suspension/ >>> >>> Regards, >>> Bill HErrin > > <Daniel Jurado.vcf>
