-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Apr 20, 2009, at 9:04 PM, David Andersen wrote:
Just a thought: A technical person might be very happy to lie to a
toothless organization that holds no real sway over him or her,
won't revoke the address space once granted, and for whom the
benefit of lots of address space in which to play exceeds any
potential pain from being caught, er, exaggerating their need for
address space.
That same technical person might be less inclined to lie to a
director of their company who asks: "Are you asking me to attest,
publicly and perhaps legally, that this information is correct? If
you're wrong and you make an ass of me, it's going to be yours that
goes out the door."
Seems like a reasonable experiment to try, at least.
I agree there is no harm in the idea but as I was reading the
announcement this morning I couldn't help but think "Too little, too
late".
Chris
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Owen - Garden City (620) 275-1900 - Lottery (noun):
President - Wichita (316) 858-3000 - A stupidity tax
Hubris Communications Inc www.hubris.net
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Public Key: http://home.hubris.net/owenc/pgpkey.txt
Comment: Public Key ID: 0xB513D9DD
iEYEARECAAYFAkntKl0ACgkQElUlCLUT2d0engCgk3EJW7uu0j9p0ArLjRmZHseP
cLMAnRqYov8CwxkF1E1pxP4zktUhA+HS
=i5o1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
