On 9/Sep/20 14:29, Chriztoffer Hansen wrote: > Why not? As a service offering, it makes total sense. Yes, makes total sense. So why aren't jumping all over it? > > Thou, generally I agree with you. Trust, but verify any received > announcement conforms to a base-set of expectations. Discard > non-conforming. This. But as always, the plan is what happens. Mark.
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto "no-... Robert Raszuk via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto "no-... Mark Tinka via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto &quo... Robert Raszuk via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto ... Mark Tinka via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-fa... Robert Raszuk via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is d... Mark Tinka via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0... Robert Raszuk via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community -... Mark Tinka via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0... Chriztoffer Hansen via NANOG
- RE: BGP Community -... adam via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0... Mark Tinka via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto &quo... Owen DeLong
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto "no-... Tom Beecher via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto &quo... Mike Hammett via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto ... Tom Beecher via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-fa... Mike Hammett via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is d... Tom Beecher via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0... Mike Hammett via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community -... Mike Hammett via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is d... Owen DeLong
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-fa... Mark Tinka via NANOG