On 21/Jun/20 23:01, Robert Raszuk wrote: > > Nope. You need to get to PQ node via potentially many hops. So you > need to have even ordered or independent label distribution to its > loopback in place. I have some testing I want to do with IS-IS only announcing the Loopback from a set of routers to the rest of the backbone, and LDP allocating labels for it accordingly, to solve a particular problem. I'll test this out and see what happens re: LDP LFA. Mark.
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Masataka Ohta
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Robert Raszuk
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Robert Raszuk
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Robert Raszuk
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Robert Raszuk
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka
- RE: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? adamv0025
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka
- RE: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? adamv0025
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Masataka Ohta
- Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why? Mark Tinka