Peter Beckman [mailto:beck...@angryox.com] wrote: >Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 11:19 AM >To: Dylan Ebner >Cc: nanog@nanog.org >Subject: RE: Fiber cut in SF area > >On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Dylan Ebner wrote: > >> It will be easier to get more divergence than secure all the >> manholes in the country. > >I still think skipping the securing of manholes and access >points in favor of active monitoring with offsite access is a >better solution.
The only thing missing from your plan was a cost analysis. Cost of each, plus operational costs, * however many of each type. How much would that be? Then amortize that out to our bills. Extra credit: would you pay for it? Chris
