On 20/Apr/20 20:21, Andrey Kostin wrote: > > So this means that there is no single source of truth for PRKI > implementation all around the world and there are different shades, > right? As a logical conclusion, the information provided on that page > may be considered incorrect in terms of proclaiming particular network > safe or not safe, but when it's claimed (sometimes blatantly) we now > have to prove to our clients that we are not bad guys. Years ago, there was talk about giving it to the IANA. Mark.
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Mark Tinka
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Mark Tinka
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Mark Tinka
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Tom Beecher
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Mark Tinka
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" tes... Andrey Kostin
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?"... Denys Fedoryshchenko
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?&... Rubens Kuhl
- Re: "Is BGP safe y... Denys Fedoryshchenko
- Re: "Is BGP safe y... Andrey Kostin
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?"... Mark Tinka
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Andrey Kostin
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Mark Tinka
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Christopher Morrow
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Alex Band
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Christopher Morrow
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test jim deleskie
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Denys Fedoryshchenko
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Baldur Norddahl
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Randy Bush
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Amir Herzberg