On 20/Apr/20 20:21, Andrey Kostin wrote:

>  
> So this means that there is no single source of truth for PRKI
> implementation all around the world and there are different shades,
> right? As a logical conclusion, the information provided on that page
> may be considered incorrect in terms of proclaiming particular network
> safe or not safe, but when it's claimed (sometimes blatantly) we now
> have to prove to our clients that we are not bad guys.

Years ago, there was talk about giving it to the IANA.

Mark.

Reply via email to