On 16/Apr/20 16:50, Saku Ytti wrote:

> That would be in IGP, so that'll work. The other way that some people
> do this, is that next-hop is CE, which is in iBGP, but recurses to
> loop0. There are some TE reasons why people might do this, and it
> would not work with Cisco ORR.

Reasonably safe to say that if you are doing TE, you are not always
satisfied with what the IGP thinks, and want to override it to some
extent :-).

Mark.

Reply via email to