In message <24124.30737.599536.809...@gargle.gargle.howl>, Sandra Murphy <sa...@tislabs.com> wrote:
>It could measure the extent of the problem and would be within what I >suggested. > >For example if there were only one AS being abused that would make it >a different priority than 1,000 or 10,000 (some seem to be implying a >number like that) being abused. > >Do we have that number? I suggested that nobody has that number, to any degree of accuracy, as of today. Once again, this is something that I would be happy to be proven wrong about. Regards, rfg
