Honestly, this. Your only real choice is what of 2 pipes to chuck it out of.
Full tables vs partial and a default don’t make the process much more intelligent for 1 site dual homed, and as mentioned routing policy will have more influence. -Ben > On Jan 24, 2020, at 8:47 AM, Mel Beckman <m...@beckman.org> wrote: > > It’s pretty pointless for a small ISP to get full routes, because the BGP > tables are so highly manipulated. It’s better to just get “company” routes > for each upstream, and then use your own traffic engineering via prepending > and static or policy routes to balance the outbound traffic the way you like. > > -mel > >> On Jan 24, 2020, at 8:40 AM, Brian <brian....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> Hello all. I am having a hard time trying to articulate why a Dual Home ISP >> should have full tables. My understanding has always been that full tables >> when dual homed allow much more control. Especially in helping to prevent >> Async routes. >> >> >> Am I crazy?
