Thanks all for the input, huawei is ruled out due to politics, looks like for costs we'll stick to the 48 ports from planet
On 1/1/20, Clayton Zekelman <clay...@mnsi.net> wrote: > > I'd recommend avoiding the C7 - ADSL2+ > performance on them isn't the best. Look for > something with a Broadcom chipset. Even an old > Calix B6 would be better than C7 - although the > B6 gear is getting old, and reliability is > sketchy. The power converter modules on board seem to go. > > At 01:51 PM 31/12/2019, Shawn L via NANOG wrote: > >>That's a tough one. 48 port dslams with >>internal splitters are easy. When you're >>looking for more density you're almost always >>looking at external splitter shelves. Could >>also look at the calix c7 platform -- tons >>around on the used market -- but then again, no splitters. >> >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: "Dennis Lundström" <den...@umnum.ca> >>Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2019 12:32pm >>To: "Nick Edwards" <nick.z.edwa...@gmail.com> >>Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org> >>Subject: Re: DSLAMs >> >>Found this one: >><ftp://ftp2.dlink.com/SUPPORT/End_of_Life_Product_List_091519.pdf>ftp://ftp2.dlink.com/SUPPORT/End_of_Life_Product_List_091519.pdf >>Stating EOL 2015-04-14 for HW revision A1. >>—Dennis >> >>On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:27 Nick Edwards >><<mailto:nick.z.edwa...@gmail.com>nick.z.edwa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>Howdy y'all >> >>Chasing some info, does dlink still sell DAS4672 - 672 port adsl2+ dslams? >> >>after simple IP based units with pppoe pass through. >>We could buy a bunch of planet 48 ports, which we used before, but we >>hoping someone still puts out high capacity (320 plus port) units with >>inbuilt pots splitters >> >>thanks > > -- > > Clayton Zekelman > Managed Network Systems Inc. (MNSi) > 3363 Tecumseh Rd. E > Windsor, Ontario > N8W 1H4 > > tel. 519-985-8410 > fax. 519-985-8409
