On 18/Dec/19 00:35, Randy Bush wrote: > > and how does that work out at scale when roa changes need previous bgp > to be run against them? If I'm honest, not something I've studied in great detail. For the moment, we are running RPKI on IOS XE boxes that are doing just peering. We have not had any routing issues on those, and I do know of a few networks that had fat-fingered their ROA's that led them to get dropped on our end due to being Invalid. The issue cleared up after they fixed their error, and there was no manual intervention needed on these routers. The customer edge is where we shall be dropping Invalids on this code base on a much larger scale. Notes to take; plenty... Mark.
- Re: Starting to D... Christopher Morrow
- Re: Starting to D... Matt Corallo
- Re: Starting to D... Rubens Kuhl
- Re: Starting to D... Christopher Morrow
- Re: Starting to Drop ... Nick Hilliard
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids ... Randy Bush
- Re: Starting to Drop Inval... Mark Tinka
- Re: Starting to Drop ... Randy Bush
- Re: Starting to D... Mark Tinka
- Re: Starting to D... Randy Bush
- Re: Starting to D... Mark Tinka
- Re: Starting to D... Mark Tinka
- Re: Starting to D... Lukas Tribus
- Re: Starting to D... Mark Tinka
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for ... Mark Tinka
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Cust... Mark Tinka
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Cust... Mark Tinka
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for ... Lukas Tribus
- RE: Starting to Drop Invalids ... Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG