Have there been any fundamental change in their network architecture that might explain pulling these caches?
________________________________ From: NANOG <[email protected]> on behalf of Shawn L via NANOG <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2019 8:20 PM To: Jared Mauch <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Elephant in the room - Akamai Same -- we had an Akamai cache for 15+ years. Then we were notified that it was done and were sent boxes to pack our stuff up and send it back. -----Original Message----- From: "Jared Mauch" <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2019 2:05pm To: "Seth Mattinen" <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Elephant in the room - Akamai > On Dec 7, 2019, at 12:06 PM, Seth Mattinen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 12/6/19 06:46, Fawcett, Nick via NANOG wrote: >> We had three onsite Akamai caches a few months ago. They called us up and >> said they are removing that service and sent us boxes to pack up the >> hardware and ship back. We’ve had quite the increase in DIA traffic as a >> result of it. > > > Same here, removed last month, and no more Akamai traffic over peering since. This last part doesn’t sound right. Can you send me details in private? Thanks, - Jared
