Have there been any fundamental change in their network architecture that might explain pulling these caches?
________________________________ From: NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> on behalf of Shawn L via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2019 8:20 PM To: Jared Mauch <ja...@puck.nether.net> Cc: nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Elephant in the room - Akamai Same -- we had an Akamai cache for 15+ years. Then we were notified that it was done and were sent boxes to pack our stuff up and send it back. -----Original Message----- From: "Jared Mauch" <ja...@puck.nether.net> Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2019 2:05pm To: "Seth Mattinen" <se...@rollernet.us> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Elephant in the room - Akamai > On Dec 7, 2019, at 12:06 PM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> wrote: > > On 12/6/19 06:46, Fawcett, Nick via NANOG wrote: >> We had three onsite Akamai caches a few months ago. They called us up and >> said they are removing that service and sent us boxes to pack up the >> hardware and ship back. We’ve had quite the increase in DIA traffic as a >> result of it. > > > Same here, removed last month, and no more Akamai traffic over peering since. This last part doesn’t sound right. Can you send me details in private? Thanks, - Jared
