Correct statement. You forgot one zero. On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:48 AM Denys Fedoryshchenko < nuclear...@nuclearcat.com> wrote:
> On 2019-11-18 04:23, Richard wrote: > > I would say you are making some assumptions that are not fact based. > > The OP is very knowledgeable and would not mince words or waste > > bandwidth. Let us see what he has to say in regards to your remarks. > > He will be able to make this more clear once he has read what people > > have stated in other responses. > > > > Respectfully, of course, Richard Golodner > > On 11/17/19 8:12 PM, Töma Gavrichenkov wrote: > > > >> Peace, > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019, 1:49 AM Rabbi Rob Thomas <r...@cymru.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>>> I am going to assume you want it to spit out 10G clean, what > >>> size > >>>> dirty traffic are you expecting it to handle? > >>> > >>> Great question! Let's say between 6Gbps and 8Gbps dirty. > >> > >> As someone making a living as a DDoS mitigation engineer for the > >> last 10 years (minus 1 month) I should say your threat model is sort > >> of unusual. Potential miscreants today should be assumed to have > >> much more to show you even on a daily basis. > >> > >> Is it like you also have something filtering upstream for you, e.g. > >> flowspec-enabled peers? > >> > >> -- > >> Töma > >> > >>> > > AFAIK new threats (SYN+ACK amplification) can't be mitigated over > flowspec and they can reach 40+Gbps easily. > -- Alexander Lyamin, VP & Founder Qrator <http://qrator.net/>* Labs CZ * office: +420 602 558 144 <++420+602+558+144> mob: +420 774 303 807 <++420+774+303+807> skype: melanor9 mailto: l...@qrator.net
