My mistake, I was also wrong about the landing site location being there, I located the site using city permitting information It's 6KM away at a local beach(woodbine).
Regards, Andrew Paolucci ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Friday, November 15, 2019 6:42 PM, Clayton Zekelman <clay...@mnsi.net> wrote: > Crosslake does not use the Enwave cooling pipes to enter 151 Front. > > Torix is at 151 Front, but 151 Front is not Torix. > > At 06:35 PM 15/11/2019, Andrew Paolucci via NANOG wrote: > >> Fresh water might not be in your scope for the article, but I believe >> crosslakefibre.ca operates a link across Lake Ontario, Buffalo to Toronto at >> TORIX 151 Front Street, but you'd need to verify with them if indeed the >> landing comes directly into the facility, this may be the case though as >> lake water is used for cooling within the facility providing conduits >> already in place. >> >> Can't wait to read the article! >> >> Regards, >> Andrew Paolucci >> >> âââââââ Original Message âââââââ >> On Friday, November 15, 2019 6:20 PM, Javier J <jav...@advancedmachines.us> >> wrote: >> >>> I would think that just a few extra fractions of a second from the cable >>> station to a DC/IX are better than a DC/IX near the beach where water can >>> wipe it all out. Preferably DC/IX should be on the 2nd or third floor IMHO >>> on some islands. >>> >>> - J >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 4:11 PM Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: >>> Some Caribbean islands had IXs in landing stations early on IIRC. Usually >>> before the island built itâs first datacenter.Some of them were >>> better/faster about moving to the datacenter once it was established than >>> others.Owen >>> >>>> On Nov 15, 2019, at 01:47 , Martijn Schmidt via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> >>>> wrote:I think AMS-IX had an exchange in Mombasa in the SEACOM landing >>>> station at some point, but that is gone now. I'm not sure about the exact >>>> reasons there but someone here probably knows what happened.There's also a >>>> big amount of carriers in the TATA landing station in Mumbai, it is the >>>> second-largest in that market just behind GPX in terms of carrier density >>>> at least according to PeeringDB.Best regards,Martijn >>>> >>>> On 11/15/19 3:58 AM, Mehmet Akcin wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey thereI have been putting my thoughts on Infrapedia blog and sharing >>>>> with folks like https://www.infrapedia.com/post/top20cities-datacentersI >>>>> am working on a new article and this time my topic will be looking at >>>>> cable landing stations(cls). Do you consider cable landing stations as a >>>>> datacenter? Do you have any experience deploying a pop in CLS? Are you >>>>> able to share (on or off record) your experience which I can refer as >>>>> your experience (good or bad) why deploying a pop inside a CLS is good or >>>>> bad idea. Any additional comments..I am not a big fan of CLS deployments. >>>>> They have limited networks ( like only carriers and no eyeballs) and very >>>>> expensive connectivity (usually) Thank you in advance sharing your >>>>> experience Mehmet --Mehmet+1-424-298-1903 > > -- > > Clayton Zekelman > Managed Network Systems Inc. (MNSi) > 3363 Tecumseh Rd. E > Windsor, Ontario > N8W 1H4 > > tel. 519-985-8410 > fax. 519-985-8409
