----- Original Message ----- > From: "Niels Bakker" <niels=na...@bakker.net>
> * j...@baylink.com (Jay R. Ashworth) [Wed 02 Oct 2019, 23:21 CEST]: >>----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Niels Bakker" <niels=na...@bakker.net> >> >>> * j...@baylink.com (Jay R. Ashworth) [Wed 02 Oct 2019, 19:30 CEST]: >>>>> From: "Livingood, Jason" <jason_living...@comcast.com> >>>>> What many people dismiss as 'lying' would be typically described as >>>>> 'complying >>>>> with the law' in certain countries. It is unfortunate that operators in >>>>> countries with legally-mandated DNS blocks are criticized for the actions >>>>> they >>>>> have no option but to undertake. IMO any such criticisms should more >>>>> correctly >>>>> be directed at the laws themselves or the governments that put them in >>>>> place. >>>> >>>>HTTP/451 >>> >>> Completely different protocol than what the rest of this thread is >>> about, much more invasive wrt possibility of logging, and requires >>> a lot more infrastructure and actual lying in DNS to make work. >> >>Closed captioned for the analogy-impaired: >> >>"The idea you're talking about, Jason, is analogous to that embodied in >>the 451 error code in HTTP." > > Oh, you weren't proposing a technical solution to a social problem? *I* wasn't proposing any solutions to any problems, at that particular twist, Neils, as I thought was obvious. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274
