On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Charles Wyble <char...@thewybles.com> wrote: > > > Christopher Morrow wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Charles Wyble <char...@thewybles.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> While researching at&t and ipv6 I came across >>> http://www.feise.com/~jfeise/blogs/index.php?blog=8 and also >> >> doesn't that blog basically say: "it's broke Jim..." and that 7018 >> (really 7132) passes off the anycast into HE.net? > > > Yes. It does say it's broken. However it's entirely possible that AT&T hands > out different routes to their l33t enterprise/govt customers with t1 or > better who pay real money, vs end users. >
yea... maybe they do, I don't see that from my view of 7018's routing data (limited as it may be) > >> >>> http://www.corp.att.com/gov/solution/network_services/data_nw/ipv6/ >>> >>> Looks like they have established a tunnel in the United States perhaps? >>> >> >> how did you gather that? Maybe Tom knows more about this and can let >> us all know? > > From: > > Remote Access Service to IPv6 Internet > > * Support IPv6 for small (or satellite) locations and individual remote > users > * Reach a dynamically configurable IPv6 Tunnel Gateway through IPv4 ISPs > through fractional T1, DSL or dial-up access > * The Tunnel Setup Protocol (TSP) will be used to create tunnels to > transport IPv6 traffic over an IPv4 network to the gateway > wow, 'tsp'... uhm, what's that I wonder? This: http://www.broker.ipv6.ac.uk/download.html perhaps?? yeek! > Granted that doesn't necessarily mean it's in the United States, but I'm > guessing it would be due to being an offering targeted at the United States > Government. :) Sure... I'd love to know though :) > > Hence my request for more comments/information. > agreed > Maybe off topic for NANOG but then what does that even mean anymore? :) I'm fairly sure that operating a network (even a v6 network) is on-topic for nanog.
