> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:02 PM Jerry Cloe <je...@jtcloe.net> wrote: > > > There's already widespread use (abuse ?) of DOD /8's. > > T-Mobile commonly assigns 26/8 space (and others) to > > customers and nat's it.
> --- cb.li...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com> > > My understanding is that is not currently commonly the > case > https://www.worldipv6launch.org/apps/ipv6week/measurement/images/graphs/T-MobileUSA.png > --------------------------------------------------- On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:31 PM Scott Weeks <sur...@mauigateway.com> wrote: > Did they renumber (IPv4) out of that space? Or are > they just not continuing to expand into it? --- cb.li...@gmail.com wrote: From: Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com> They stopped using ipv4 assigned for handsets for most cases with 464xlat <snip> -------------------------------------- Ah, OK. I didn't realize they were just using it for handsets. I thought the address space was used elsewhere. When orgs do this the ugliness of squatting sticks to the org seemingly forever like stink on sh!+ scott
